MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799683846

Discontinuities in the Icebox Formation (Ordovician), Williston Basin, North Dakota and Montana

2004· article· en· W2799683846 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aaron J. Ulishney

Bibliographic record

VenueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrdovicianGeologyPaleontologyStructural basinClassification of discontinuities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ordovician Winnipeg Group is composed of three formations; in ascending order, the Black Island Formation, the Icebox Formation, and the Roughlock Formation. The Icebox Formation is largely composed of shale. This work shows that discontinuities and coarser facies exist within the Icebox Formation and that they are traceable throughout the subsurface of North Dakota and eastern Montana. This work also illustrates possible sea-level changes during the deposition of the Icebox Formation along with probable source areas providing detrital sediments into the study area. Gamma-ray wireline logs were used to distinguish the formations of the Winnipeg Group from each other, and isopach maps were constructed for each formation to ensure consistency and uniformity in the stratigraphic data. Most gamma-ray curves within the Icebox Formation interval tend to extend off-scale. A total of 365 gamma-ray curves were extracted from a LogSleuthTM program and converted into a digital format using Surfer™ for Windows. The individual log segments were traced and adjusted to eliminate the off-scale effect. The digitized well logs were then converted into a numerical format using UN-SCAN-IT™ for Windows and the x-y coordinates were imported into Petra™ for Windows. Nine west-east and nine north-south cross-sections were constructed across the study area. Traceable discontinuities were established by correlating digitized wireline log curves using similar gamma-ray signatures within the same stratigraphic interval. These discontinuities and coarser facies were arbitrarily labeled D1 through D40 and classified as extensive or isolated discontinuities. The extensive discontinuities were separated into three groups: major, intermediate, and minor discontinuities. Attribute and isopach maps were then constructed to display thicknesses and distributions of the discontinuities. Traceable discontinuities exist within the Icebox Formation of the Winnipeg Group throughout the subsurface of North Dakota and eastern Montana and these discontinuities probably consist of bioturbated silt and sand. The discontinuities are mappable on both large and small scales as illustrated by the isopach and attribute maps such as major, intermediate, and minor discontinuities. During the deposition of the Icebox Formation, the study area was covered by a warm, shallow, epicontinental sea. The Icebox Formation probably represents an offshore marine environment that was below normal wave base adjacent to a nearshore marine environment in the northwestern part of the study area. The extensive discontinuities could represent detrital sediments, probably from Deadwood deposits or reworked Precambrian rocks; which were deposited from distal sources such as the Canadian Shield and a southern deltaic source. Major, intermediate, and minor discontinuities indicate that the rate of sediment input varied throughout Icebox Formation time. The thick extensive discontinuities in the northwestern part of the study area could be sediment deposits from a paleoshoreline along which sea-level fluctuated throughout the deposition of the Icebox Formation. The isolated discontinuities were probably deposited on topographically high areas such as the Nesson Anticline, the Burleigh High, and the Stutsman High. The Ordovician sea was deeper relative to sea-level during the deposition of the extensive discontinuities, but still shallow enough for sediments to be deposited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207