Performance of Ground-Glass Pozzolan as a Cementitious Material—A Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ground-glass pozzolan (GP) obtained by grinding the mixed-waste glass to a similar fineness as cement can act as a supplementary cementing material (SCM), given that it is an amorphous and a pozzolanic material. The GP showed promising performance in mortar and concrete mixtures in laboratory and in large-scale field applications, enabling it to be a useful new SCM. However, while there are results about the use of GP in mortar and concrete, there is no single study covering all the aspects of using GP in mortar and concrete that satisfies the requirements of the ASTM and CSA Standard Specifications. This review on the use of GP in mortar and concrete compiles and analyzes the available data concerning the characteristics, production rates, and performance of GP used in mortar and concrete to provide the necessary information for updating the ASTM and CSA Standard Specifications to consider the GP as a new SCM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it