MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799689214 · doi:10.5430/wje.v8n2p168

Research on Contextual Memorizing of Meaning in Foreign Language Vocabulary

2018· article· en· W2799689214 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Linjing Xu, Qingxia Xiong, Yufang Qin

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSecond Language Acquisition and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJiangxi Normal University
KeywordsMemorizationVocabularyMeaning (existential)PsychologySentenceTRACE (psycholinguistics)CognitionLinguisticsForeign languageTest (biology)Cognitive psychologyVocabulary developmentHierarchyMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to examine the role of contexts in the memory of meaning in foreign vocabularies. Thestudy was based on the cognitive processing hierarchy theory of Craik and Lockhart (1972), the memory trace theoryof McClelland and Rumelhart (1986) and the memory trace theory of cognitive psychology. The subjects werenon-English majors freshmen. The contexts used in the study were list, sentence and text. Through timely test anddelay test, it was found that sentence performed better than text, which was different from expectation. After analysisand interview, some problems were found in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of EducationSame topicSecond Language Acquisition and LearningFrench-language works237,207