Dual-Polarized <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$L$ </tex-math> </inline-formula>-Band and Single-Polarized <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$X$ </tex-math> </inline-formula>-Band Shared-Aperture SAR Array
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New designs of slot elements and a new configuration for array antennas for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) at L- and X-bands are presented. The L-band elements are cavity-backed crossed slots for dual polarization, and for X-band, interleaved ridged waveguide slot subarrays are used. The height of the L-band cavity is reduced by adopting an inverted-T configuration. Each of the crossed slots is fed by a pair of differential probes to ensure the correct modal excitation with high isolation. For evaluation, the X-band slot subarray is center fed by a coax probe although slot excitation is also possible. An initial prototype array comprising 4 × 3 L-band elements interleaved with X-band subarrays was fabricated to allow initial measurements. This element design is applicable for larger arrays and can be readily configured to frequency ratios other than L- and X-bands. A construction advantage of the slot design over SAR patch arrays is the use of all-metallic surfaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it