Capacity Achieving Distributions and Separation Principle for Feedback Gaussian Channels With Memory: the LQG Theory of Directed Information
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A method is developed to realize optimal channel input conditional distributions, which maximize the finite transmission feedback information (FTFI) capacity, often called $n$ -block length feedback capacity, by information lossless randomized strategies. The method is applied to compute closed form expressions for the FTFI capacity and feedback capacity, of nonstationary, nonergodic, unstable, multiple input multiple output Gaussian channels with memory on past channel outputs, subject to average transmission cost constraints of quadratic form in the channel inputs and outputs. It is shown that randomized strategies decompose into two orthogonal parts-an deterministic part, which controls the channel output process, and an innovation part, which transmits new information over the channel. Then a separation principle is shown between the computation of the optimal deterministic part and the random part of the optimal randomized strategies. Finally, the ergodic theory of linear-quadratic-Gaussian stochastic optimal control theory, is applied to identify sufficient conditions, expressed in terms of solutions to matrix difference and algebraic Riccati equations, so that the optimal control part of randomized strategies induces asymptotic stationarity and ergodicity, and feedback capacity is characterized by the per unit time limit of the FTFI capacity. The method reveals an interaction of the control and the information transmission parts of the optimal randomized strategies, and that whether feedback increases capacity, is directly related to the channel parameters and the transmission cost function, through the solutions of the matrix Riccati equations. For unstable channels, it is shown that feedback capacity exists and it is strictly positive, provided the power exceeds a critical threshold.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".