MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799727668 · doi:10.1080/13645145.2018.1452371

Ethnography and armchair visual artistry: Charles Nicolas Cochin’s illustrations of the <i>Histoire générale des voyages</i>

2018· article· fr· W2799727668 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Travel Writing · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdventureEthnographyTasteArt historyHistoryArtVisual artsLiteratureArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From 1746 to 1759, the abbé Prévost produced the Histoire générale des voyages, a collection of voyages and travels, partially translated from the English collection A New General Collection of Voyages and Travels. Mostly known as the author of the novel Manon Lescaut (1731), Prévost was also recognised for his penmanship, his taste for travel adventures and for his scholarly translations of historical books. This article focuses on the involvement of French artist Charles-Nicolas Cochin in undertaking several images for the French collection. Cochin recycled the existing images from the English edition but also drew new illustrations for previously unillustrated portions of the text, renewing the text–image relationships at work. The comparison of both texts reveals cultural differences pertaining to the visual aesthetics of travel illustrations which, in turn, formed the basis for different representations of the faraway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it