MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799827640 · doi:10.7939/r3mk65h0c

U-Pb geochronology and REE geochemistry of the pulsed Cretaceous magmatism in High Arctic Canada: implications for lithospheric evolution and magma genesis

2016· article· en· W2799827640 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David M Dockman

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeochronologyGeologyMagmatismGeochemistryCretaceousMagmaArcticIsotope geochemistryEarth sciencePaleontologyTectonicsVolcanoOceanographyIsotope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cretaceous magmatism in the Sverdrup Basin of Arctic Canada consists of alkalic and tholeiitic phases that are widely considered to be part of the circum-Arctic High Arctic large igneous province (HALIP). The emplacement of large igneous provinces is commonly attributed to mantle plumes. However, recent studies have questioned the validity of a plume model for the HALIP, as well as questioned whether the younger magmatic phases of the province should be included as part of the same LIP. A paucity of U-Pb ages of mafic intrusions and robust Ar/Ar ages has hindered tectonomagmatic interpretations of this geographically remote province. This study presents new major- and trace-element geochemical data plus Sr-Nd isotope systematics for mafic intrusions and lavas collected from Ellesmere and Axel Heiberg Islands, accompanied by new U-Pb and Ar/Ar ages to better constrain the temporal evolution of the HALIP and the controls on its magma chemistry. After accounting for the effects of crustal contamination, Sr-Nd isotope systematics indicate that tholeiitic and alkalic magmas are derived from similar mantle sources, with no evidence for the input of enriched lithospheric mantle. Therefore, variations in REE geochemistry between the two magma types are interpreted as being primarily controlled by differences in the lithospheric ‘lid’ thickness. REE inversion modeling revealed a bimodal distribution in ‘lid’ thickness (65 ± 5 and 45 ± 4 km). Correlation of magma chemistry with regional structural analysis indicates that the production and emplacement of alkalic and tholeiitic magmas are spatially segregated by the tectonic domains of the Sverdrup Basin. Six U-Pb and four Ar/Ar ages obtained in the present study range from 122 ± 2 Ma to 78.5 ± 1.8 Ma, within the range of previously published results for the HALIP. The U-Pb ages are the first reported on mafic intrusive sheets on Axel Heiberg and Ellesmere Islands, including two coincident age determinations at ~117 Ma, which is an age that previous studies have yet to report. In addition, the discovery of a xenocrystic zircon, within a diabase intrusive, that crystallized from a mafic melt at 184.6 ± 1.8 Ma documents the first reported evidence of Jurassic magmatism in the Sverdrup Basin. These new age results, combined with all modern (post-2000) published ages, detail a >50 Myr duration of magma emplacement that occurred in at least three pulses, around 122 Ma, 95 Ma, and 81 Ma, with gaps of 21 and 6 Myr between pulses. We suggest that the ~122 Ma pulse, which is exclusively tholeiitic, may be primarily plume-generated and should be correlated to the other circum-Arctic tholeiites within the HALIP. However, in the younger magmatism, the contemporaneous production of alkalic and tholeiitic magmas, their spatial distribution, and the periodicity of the last two pulses (~95 and 81 Ma) indicate that alternating modes of edge-driven mantle convection (EDC) might be the primary control on magma genesis. A distal plume could intensify EDC magma production, but the influence of a mantle plume on the ~95 and 81 Ma pulses would be secondary to EDC and thus these younger magmas should not be considered part of the HALIP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.140
Teacher spread0.134 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207