MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799836761 · doi:10.7939/r3416t92n

Meso- and Neoarchaean Banded Iron Formations of the Slave Craton, NW Canada: Seawater Chemistry, Source Characteristics, Depositional Setting and Age Constraints

2016· article· en· W2799836761 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rasmus Haugaard Nielsen

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentary depositional environmentGeologyCratonSeawaterGeochemistryPaleontologyOceanographyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Banded iron formations (BIFs) are iron- and silica-rich chemical sedimentary rocks that have been widely used as a proxy for the chemical and redox composition of Achaean seawater. Within the Slave Craton (Northwest Territories, Canada), two different BIF deposits exist: (1) an ~ 2.85 Ga unit deposited in a continental rift basin, associated with fuchsitic quartzite, conglomerate and basement gneisses, and (2) an ~ 2.62 Ga unit deposited in an arc-type basin and found interbedded with extensive greywackemudstone turbidite sequences. The time frame within which these BIFs were deposited records major changes in global Archaean environmental conditions, such as mantle plume activity, continental assembly and changes in oceanic and atmospheric chemistry. Although these palaeoenvironmental factors can potentially be traced in BIFs, this study shows that these deposits tend to reflect phenomena that are strongly dependent on localto- regional palaeoenvironmental conditions. This thesis presents new petrologic and geochemical insights into the deposition of these poorly studied Slave Craton BIF deposits. It interprets their geochemical seawater signature from a local-to-regional perspective as it relates to the ambient environment, and it provides a new understanding of the interplay of the dominant solute sources controlling seawater composition at the time. Both BIF deposits display seawater derived shale-normalized rare earth elements + yttrium (REY) patterns enriched in heavy-REE relative to light-REE (HREE>LREE) and positive lanthanum (La) and yttrium (Y) anomalies. High-resolution, layer-by-layer geochemical and samarium-neodymium (Sm-Nd) isotope analyses further reveal that both BIF deposits were precipitated in a basin where seawater was a mixture of deep, iii hydrothermal waters and surface waters with solutes sourced from land. The high silica contents (up to 20 wt.% SiO2) in the iron bands and low iron contents (down to 4 wt. Fe2O3) in the silica bands show that background silica sedimentation within the water column was frequently interrupted by the convective upwelling of iron-rich water masses. In the older 2.85 Ga BIF, the iron-rich bands all have positive εNd(t) values which demonstrate that the dissolved REY in the source water during ferric iron precipitation was provided by deeper-marine hydrothermal fluids with relatively uniform 143Nd/144Nd. The surface water, on the other hand, was heterogeneous and controlled by a wide range of REY sources all related to both radiogenic (positive εNd(t) values) and unradiogenic (negative εNd(t) values) continental landmasses. In the younger 2.62 Ga BIF, high germanium/silicon (Ge/Si) ratios in the iron bands, and low Ge/Si ratios in the silica bands are further evidence for the interplay between upper silica rich and deeper iron rich seawater during BIF formation. However, a difference between the ambient seawater behind deposition of the younger and older BIF deposits is the size of the hydrothermal contribution and the presence of a strong oxidant (e.g., O2) in the 2.62 Ga BIF. During active rifting of the basement, a large excess of reduced europium (Eu2+) from hightemperature hydrothermal fluids impacted the basin water and was incorporated in the precursor precipitate of the ca. 2.85 Ga BIF. The positive Eu anomaly is larger than in similarly-aged BIF deposits, as well as to the younger 2.62 Ga BIF in this study. Whereas the older BIF do not show any anomalies of cerium (Ce), parts of the younger BIF displays negative Ce anomalies, which indicate the presence of an oxidizing agent that was able to fractionate Ce3+ to Ce4+ in the 2.62 Ga seawater. These findings clearly indicate the importance of addressing each BIF within its own depositional context, as iv they can reveal detectable changes in the evolution of relative water mass contributions in a particular depositional basin, over time. The 2.62 Ga BIF is found interstratified with large volume of greywackemudstone turbidite deposits. As a modern analogue turbidites are deposited by density driven currents containing suspended debris. The extensive turbidite sedimentation associated with the BIF has noticeably impacted its elemental budget. As such, the slow chemical rainout of the precursor precipitates in this BIF likely took place on the basin floor adjacent to a steep submarine ramp. BIF deposition was episodically interrupted by turbidite currents and slump-generated debris flows sourced from the adjacent, tectonically active arc-terrain. Until now, the depositional timing of the 2.62 Ga BIF deposit has been based entirely on maximum depositional ages in detrital zircons from the associated turbidites. In this study we found a felsic-to-intermediate, ~3-cm-thick, tuff ash bed, interlayered within the turbidite-BIF sequence at Slemon Lake in the southwest part of the Slave Craton. The tuff yielded a single zircon age population with a U-Pb zircon crystallization age of 2620 ± 6 Ma. This crystallization age defines the age of these turbidite-BIF. The date defined by the tuff ash bed, together with maximum detrital zircon ages carried out on greywackes across the craton, separates the turbidite-BIF deposits into its own stratigraphic group, which we propose to be named the Slemon Group. The trace element signature of the tuff ash bed is reminiscent of arc-type volcanics, likely associated with the Defeat suite granitoids, thereby linking the younger turbidite-BIF basin to its overall tectonic environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.133
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207