(En)Gendering Equality? Conditional Cash Transfers as National Development in Post‐Neoliberal Ecuador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen En el Ecuador postneoliberal, el Bono de Desarrollo Humano (BDH) es una transferencia monetaria condicionada que promueve el proyecto gubernamental buen vivir que promete extender la inclusión socioeconómica a algunos de los ciudadanos más pobres. En este artículo enfoco en las prácticas de subsistencia que se cruzan con las suposiciones acerca de los hogares y la maternidad que subyacen el BHD. Basado en 15 meses de investigación etnográfica, aquí exploro los casos de tres mujeres que se encuentran no aptas para BDH debido a los modos informales y frecuentemente precarios en que se las ingenian para proveer para sus familias. Concluyo con el argumento de que el mismo proceso mediante el cual las mujeres se la ingenian para proveer las excluye del programa de transferencia monetaria y al mismo tiempo las excluye de las promesas del de igualdad y redistribución del gobierno. [buen vivir, post‐neoliberal, reducción de la pobreza, desarrollo, bono de desarrollo humano, madres, género, Ecuador, Intag]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".