MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799855532 · doi:10.20360/langandlit29381

« Il y a des mamans qui aiment le travail et des mamans qui aiment jouer » Reformulation orale, atelier d’écriture et compétences en littératie

2018· article· fr· W2799855532 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hélène Castany-Owhadi, Yves Soulé, Martine Dreyfus

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage and Literacy · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La présente étude explore le rôle des reformulations orales au sein d’un atelier d’écriture en première année du primaire, dans une visée compréhensive de l’activité conjointe[1] pour le développement des compétences en littératie. À partir d’un extrait de verbatim dans une classe particulièrement performante, nous étudions les jeux de reformulations entre l’enseignant et un élève en insécurité scripturale en mettant en évidence la complexité du processus d’étayage. [1] Au sens de Sensevy (2011) qui, dans sa théorie de l’action conjointe en didactique, affirme que l’on ne peut comprendre l’action de l’élève sans faire le lien avec l’action de l’enseignant dans le savoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLanguage and LiteracySame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207