MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799874369 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2004-0031

A MULTI-LAYER NEURO-FUZZY NETWORK FOR TOOL-PIECE COLLISIONS DETECTION IN CAD/CAM

2004· article· en· W2799874369 on OpenAlexaffvenue
A. Khoukhi, K. Benfreha

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsEspace pour la vie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCADMachiningCollisionComputer scienceArtificial neural networkCollision detectionPoint (geometry)Quality (philosophy)Fuzzy logicState (computer science)Layer (electronics)Engineering drawingEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM), the technicians have often been confronted with situations of collisions on a manufacturing site, between mobile elements and static elements of the machine. The objective of this study is to develop a neuro-fuzzy technology for the recognition of machining states in CAD/CAM, in particular, the collision states between different profiles, and the treatment after a collision detection. This work is divided in two parts; the first is to design a multiple layers neural-network, which after training evaluates the quality of a machining state at a point of the profile, and therefore the probability of existence of a collision between two profiles. The second part is a design of a fuzzy system that intervenes after the passage of the first tool. If there was a bad quality of machining, the system decides to pass one or several other tools, in order to find the necessary tools for this phase and the corresponding zones, while preventing collisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207