MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799878545 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2018.2827843

Hilbert Huang Transform Based Online Differential Relay Algorithm for a Shunt-Compensated Transmission Line

2018· article· en· W2799878545 on OpenAlexaff
Sandeep Biswal, Monalisa Biswal, O.P. Malik

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmission lineControl theory (sociology)Hilbert–Huang transformElectric power transmissionAlgorithmProtective relayElectric power systemElectronic engineeringTransformerCurrent transformerElectrical impedanceEngineeringRelayVoltageComputer scienceElectrical engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A differential protection scheme, based on real-time analysis of a time-frequency based technique, is proposed for a transmission line with a midpoint-connected static synchronous compensator (STATCOM). The first intrinsic mode function obtained from the decomposition of current signals from both ends of the transmission system, processed through an ensemble empirical mode decomposition technique, is used to estimate the discrete Teager energy (DTE) through online Hilbert-Huang transformation. The differential DTE from both ends of the line is used to detect the exact faulty phase. For analysis, a midpoint STATCOM compensated transmission line model is considered and simulated using EMTDC/PSCAD. Test cases, such as high fault resistance, fault inception angle, reverse power flow, current transformer saturation, and variation in source impedance, are generated for different operating modes of the STATCOM. The method is also tested for a cross-country fault in a double-circuit transmission system. Comparative assessment reports with other conventional approaches verify the reliability, speed, and feasibility of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207