MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799899282 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2000-0039

ADAPTIVE CONTROL OF AN ACTIVE SUSPENSION FOR NONLINEAR TIME VARYING VEHICLE PLANT

2000· article· en· W2799899282 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Rao V. Dukkipati, S.S. Vallurupalli

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemAdaptive controlController (irrigation)Active suspensionSuspension (topology)A priori and a posterioriComputer scienceNonlinear controlTime domainOptimal controlDegrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Control engineeringReference modelEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsActuatorMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new adaptive control approach to general multi-degrees-of-freedom suspension models. The control concept diverts from the widely applied optimal control to adaptive control. The basic idea involves obtaining optimal performance of any nonlinear time varying suspension model by adaptively following a predefined reference model. Optimal performance is achieved by an adaptive control law, which involves feed forward, feedback and auxiliary controller parameters. Model reference adaptive control is used to derive adaptation laws for the controller. The proposed control scheme is computationally fast and does not require a priori knowledge of complex nonlinear dynamic variations and time varying parameters of the model. Simulation results for a two-degree of freedom nonlinear suspension model subjected to random asphalt road input are presented. The time and frequency domain results indicate good performance of adaptive controller even for large dynamic variations of model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicVibration Control and Rheological FluidsFrench-language works237,207