MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799914084 · doi:10.2118/190055-ms

Enhanced Proppant Suspension in a Fracturing Fluid Through Capillary Bridges

2018· article· en· W2799914084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harvey Quintero, Mike Mattucci, Bill O’Neil, G. Folkes, K. Zhang, C. Z. Wang, Weibing Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Western Regional Meeting · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulic fracturingFracturing fluidPetroleum engineeringGeologySettlingPermeability (electromagnetism)Tight gasBuoyancyGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The development of tight oil and gas shale relies heavily on multi-staged hydraulic fracturing, with the objective being to induce a complex network of interconnected fractures (artificial and natural), effectively created by water-like viscous fluids and sand laden slurries injected at very high pressures and rates. Numerous methods have been employed to reduce sand settling and duning during hydraulic fracturing. Conventionally, frac designs have relied on injection rate, and viscoelasticity of the fluid to offset sand, or proppant settling. As of late, development in proppant technologies have focused on introducing alternative engineered materials for proppants that feature oil field brine pseudo specific gravity (S.G.), while maintaining mechanical strength, therefore relying on the buoyancy effect for proppant transport; despite all these efforts, proppant suspension remains a burden for the fracturing fluid. Herein, we report a pioneering fracturing fluid where through inducing capillary bridges proppant sands become part of the fluid structure and are no longer the burden to be carried. This new fluid system offers a unique and superior proppant transport mechanism, under a wide range of shear stress and rate conditions, without the need for conventional polymers and/or cross-linkers. This field-proven and cost-effective fracturing fluid features a non-damaging synthetic polymer. Field cases show successful placements of proppant where other conventional fracturing fluids have failed/screened-out. Regained permeability analysis indicates ≥100% regained permeability when Bandera sandstone (~1 - 10 md permeability) core samples were tested. Proppant settling test analysis showed no proppant settling in a 5 hour period when 500 kg/m3 (4.17 lb/gal) of 30/50 U.S mesh size proppant laden slurry was tested, simulating a bottomhole temperature (BHT) of 70°C (158°F). Also, a more than 33% increase in sand pack volume in the slurry was observed during the aforementioned analysis when compared to a borate-crosslinked guar slurry counterpart. This paper intends to detail the development, laboratory testing and field cases of this novel fracturing fluid, that has been successfully pumped in more than 150 frac stages in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Western Regional MeetingSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207