Suivi et évaluation d'un éco-procédé par adsorption sur lit filtrant pour le traitement des eaux de ruissellement routier
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La nécessité du traitement d'eaux de ruissellement routier chargées en sel de voirie (sodium, calcium, chlorure) et d'eaux issues d'une agriculture intensive (phosphore) a permis l'étude (Saint-Augustin, Canada) et l'évaluation de la transposition (Massif-Central, France) d'une unité filtrante basée sur des principes physicochimiques d'adsorption. Un suivi qualitatif et hydraulique des eaux de surface ainsi qu'une étude des matériaux constituant l'unité (calcite, dolomie, pouzzolane, anthracite) ont été accomplis. Des mesures de débit par déversoir, essais de traçage, échantillonnage d'eau ont été réalisés sur terrain. Des essais d'adsorption, cinétiques, isothermes et colonnes ont été faits en laboratoire. L'étude terrain a montré que l'unité filtrante est assimilable à un réacteur piston pour des débits supérieurs à 400 mL/s, et permet un abattement maximum respectif de 67%, 71% et 70% pour le chlorure, calcium et phosphore total. L'étude en laboratoire a révélé une adsorption de 20% du sodium (calcite) et 15,4% du chlorure (dolomie).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | high |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it