MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799970156 · doi:10.1111/ijfs.13786

Metal binding novel flaxseed peptides (linusorbs)

2018· article· en· W2799970156 on OpenAlexaff
Pramodkumar D. Jadhav, Yang Zuo, Youn Young Shim, Jianheng Shen, Martin J. T. Reaney, Ning Zhang, Yong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Food Science & Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Canadian institutionsGenome PrairieUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
KeywordsMetalChemistryMetal ions in aqueous solutionMethioninePeptideNuclear chemistryMass spectrometryAmino acidInorganic chemistryStereochemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Linusorbs (LOs; a.k.a. cyclolinopeptides) are naturally occurring orbitides derived from flaxseed. These compounds consist of 8–10 amino acid residues, which are linked via an N‐ to C‐terminal peptide bond with molecular masses of approximately 1 kDa. The LO circular structure makes them candidates for metal binding studies. Flaxseed extracts are known to suppress Pb and Cd toxicity. Hence, four metal salts surveyed include Zn(CH3COO)2, ZnSO4, Pb(CH3COO)2 and Cd(NO3)2 with pure LOs 1–5. Proton NMR spectra indicated interaction of LOs with metal salts in solution and were used to determine impacts of methionine oxidation on interactions with metal ions. The methyl group of methionine S,S‐dioxide of related LOs did not show the same shift in the presence of Zn(CH3COO)2 and Pb(CH3COO)2 observed in their methionine S‐oxide analogues. Metal complexes were observed forming at 10−2 m to 10−4 m but not at lower concentrations (10−5 m to 10−8 m). Mass spectrometry data confirmed that metal binding strength varied by metal in the order Zn(CH3COO)2 CH3COO)2 SO4 NO3)2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Food Science & TechnologySame topicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFrench-language works237,207