MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799973875 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2012-0013

THE SMOOTH PARTICLE VARIABLE STRUCTURE FILTER

2012· article· en· W2799973875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCovarianceControl theory (sociology)Particle filterState variableKalman filterVariable (mathematics)Nonlinear systemEnsemble Kalman filterFilter (signal processing)Extended Kalman filterComputer scienceMathematicsAlgorithmStatisticsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a new state and parameter estimation method is introduced based on the particle filter (PF) and the smooth variable structure filter (SVSF). The PF is a popular estimation method, which makes use of distributed point masses to form an approximation of the probability distribution function (PDF). The SVSF is a relatively new estimation strategy based on sliding mode concepts, formulated in a predictor-corrector format. It has been shown to be very robust to modeling errors and uncertainties. The combined method, referred to as the smooth particle variable structure filter (SPVSF), utilizes the estimates and state error covariance of the SVSF to formulate the proposal distribution which generates the particles used by the PF. The SPVSF method is applied on two computer experiments, namely a nonlinear target tracking scenario and estimation of electrohydrostatic actuator parameters. The results are compared with other popular Kalman-based estimation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it