MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800009077 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2013-0090

INDOOR LOCALIZATION OF AN OMNI-DIRECTIONAL WHEELED MOBILE ROBOT

2013· article· en· W2800009077 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sasha Ginzburg, Scott Nokleby

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdometryMobile robotBeaconRobotPoseComputer visionComputer scienceEncoderGlobal Positioning SystemArtificial intelligenceSensor fusionOrientation (vector space)WorkspacePosition (finance)Real-time computingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a localization system developed for estimating the pose, i.e., position and orientation, of an omni-directional wheeled mobile robot operating in indoor structured environments. The developed system uses a combination of relative and absolute localization methods for pose estimation. Odometry serves as the relative localization method providing pose estimates through the integration of measurements obtained from shaft encoders on the robot’s drive motors. Absolute localization is achieved with a novel GPS-like system that performs localization of active beacons mounted on the mobile robot based on distance measurements to receivers fixed at known positions in the robot’s indoor workspace. A simple data fusion algorithm is used in the localization system to combine the pose estimates from the two localization methods and achieve improved performance. Experimental results demonstrating the performance of the developed system at localizing the omni-directional robot in an indoor environment are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207