MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800010637 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2004-0018

THE KINEMATICS Of MOBILE ROBOTS WITH ORIENTABLE SINGLE AND DUAL WHEELS ROLLING ON A PLANE

2004· article· en· W2800010637 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Svetlana Ostrovskaya, Jorge Angeles

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsMobile robotRobotPlanarCompatibility (geochemistry)Dual (grammatical number)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceMathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringPhysicsCombinatoricsArtificial intelligenceClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kinematics of wheeled mobile robots (WMRs) equipped with an arbitrary number of either conventional orientable wheels or dual-wheel units (DWUs) is the subject of this paper. The configuration of a robot with s such, wheels is defined by 3 + 2s variables, three for the platform configuration and two for each single wheel or dual-wheel unit. However, not all variables related to the wheel configuration are independent since, for the platform to be able to undergo an arbitrary planar motion, the wheel-unit configurations must satisfy s − 2 compatibility conditions. Therefore, the number of independent variables which defines the degree of freedom (dof) of the system is 3 + 2s − (s − 2) = s + 5. On the other hand, it is made apparent that wheeled mobile robots equipped with at least three orientable wheels have three independent generalized velocities. Hence, the mobility of these robots, which is defined as their number of independent generalized velocities, is three; in other words, they are of full mobility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsFrench-language works237,207