MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Political Economy of Media Effects

2017· other· en· W2800014298 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Mosco, Ian Nagy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Encyclopedia of Media Effects · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media and Politics
Canadian institutionsAboriginal Affairs Northern Dev CanadaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsHegemonyAgency (philosophy)Perspective (graphical)Power (physics)Class (philosophy)Race (biology)SociologyPoint (geometry)Sociological imaginationTerrainPolitical economyWork (physics)EconomyPolitical scienceSocial sciencePositive economicsEpistemologyEconomicsGender studiesGeographyEngineeringComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The political economy of communication provides one significant theoretical starting point for the analysis of media effects. It is therefore important to define the perspective, identify its primary characteristics, and describe major schools of thought. The political economy approach to media effects is distinguished by its emphasis on power as well as on social structural (rather than on individual psychological) effects, which are mediated by social class, gender, and race, among other sociological variables. There are some significant differences within the political economy approach to media effects, particularly between strong, direct, and instrumental effects, as evidenced in the work of Parenti, Chomsky, and Herman, and complex effects, based on the construction of hegemony through the mutual constitutions of producers and users, who use their agency in a contested terrain. The work of Murdock and Golding as well as of Wasko and Meehan provide exemplars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Encyclopedia of Media EffectsSame topicSocial Media and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207