BEARING PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION ASSESSMENT BY ORTHOGONAL LOCAL PRESERVING PROJECTION AND CONTINUOUS HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bearing is the key component in rotating machine. It is important to assess the performance degradation degree of bearings for making proactive maintenance and realizing near-zero downtime. A methodology based on orthogonal local preserving projection (OLPP) and continuous hidden Markov model (CHMM) is introduced in bearing performance degradation assessment. Firstly, the time domain, frequency domain and time-frequency domain features are extracted from the vibration signals. Then, the multi-dimensional features are reduced by OLPP. And the selection of the adjacent paragraph parameters in OLPP is optimized adaptively by minimizing the ratio of between-class distance to within-class distance. A CHMM is trained by using the reduced feature in normal condition. At last, the test bearing data are input into the pre-trained CHMM to calculate the log-likelihood of the test data, which can assess the performance degradation of bearings quantitatively. A bearing accelerated life experiment is performed to validate the feasibility and validity of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".