Real-time Interobserver Agreement in Bowel Ultrasonography for Diagnostic Assessment in Patients With Crohn’s Disease: An International Multicenter Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The unavailability of standardized parameters in bowel ultrasonography (US) commonly used in Crohn's disease (CD) and the shortage of skilled ultrasonographers are 2 limiting factors in the use of this imaging modality around the world. The aim of this study is to evaluate interobserver agreement among experienced sonographers in the evaluation of bowel US parameters in order to improve standardization in imaging reporting and interpretation. METHODS: Fifteen patients with an established diagnosis of CD underwent blinded bowel US performed by 6 experienced sonographers. Prior to the evaluation, the sonographers and clinical and radiological IBD experts met to formally define the US parameters. Interobserver agreement was tested with the Quatto method (s). RESULTS: All operators agreed on the presence/absence of CD lesions and distinguished absence of/mild activity or moderate/severe lesions in all patients. S values were moderate for bowel wall thickness (s = 0.48, P = n.s.), bowel wall pattern (s = 0.41, P = n.s.), vascularization (s = 0.52, P = n.s.), and presence of lymphnodes (s = 0.61, P = n.s.). Agreement was substantial for lesion location (s = 0.68, P = n.s.), fistula (s = 0.74, P = n.s.), phlegmon (s = 0.78, P = 0.04), and was almost perfect for abscess (s = 0.95, P = 0.02). Poor agreement was observed for mesenteric adipose tissue alteration, lesion extent, stenosis, and prestenotic dilation. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the majority of the US parameters used in CD showed moderate/substantial agreement. The development of shared US imaging interpretation patterns among sonographers will lead to improved comparability of US results among centers and facilitate the development of multicenter studies and the spread of bowel US training, thereby allowing a wider adoption of this useful technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".