MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800093702 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2017-1042

ENTROPY GENERATION FOR A NON-NEWTONIAN SHEAR THINNING FLUID WITH VISCOUS HEATING EFFECTS

2017· article· en· W2800093702 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muharrem İmal, Coşkun Özalp, Bülent Yanıktepe, Mohammed Mehdi-Rashidi, Ertaç Hürdoğan

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBejan numberMechanicsBrinkman numberShear thinningThermodynamicsHeat transferPhysicsNon-Newtonian fluidMaterials scienceViscosityNusselt numberReynolds number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports the entropy generation of a two-dimensional, non-isothermal, steady, hydrodynamically and thermally fully-developed flow of an incompressible, non-Newtonian shear thinning fluid between two infinite parallel plates. The inelastic fluid is modeled by a two parameter Carreau constitutive equation with an exponential temperature dependence of viscosity. Temperature dependence of the fluid is modeled through Arrhenius law. Momentum and energy balance equations, which govern the flow, are coupled, and this nonlinear boundary value problem is solved numerically using a Pseudospectral method based on the Chebyshev polynomials. The effect of various flow controlling parameters on velocity, temperature and entropy generation is analyzed. The results indicated that Brinkman number and activation energy have opposite effects on entropy generation due to heat transfer. In contrast to the power-law index, an increase in the material time constant results in a decrease in the Bejan Number.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207