MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800094065 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2018.2825402

Compact Full Band OMT Based on Dual-Mode Double-Ridge Waveguide

2018· article· en· W2800094065 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed A. Abdelaal, Shoukry I. Shams, Mahmoud Elsaadany, Ahmed A. Kishk

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveguidePort (circuit theory)Multi-band deviceCoupling (piping)PhysicsFrequency bandOpticsElectronic engineeringEngineeringAntenna (radio)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nonstandard dual mode, double-ridge waveguide is utilized to design a compact orthomode transducer (OMT). The OMT is terminated with a standard circular waveguide common port and two standard isolated rectangular waveguide ports. The proposed structure exploits a one-fold symmetry to eliminate the coupling to the in-band higher order odd modes within the common port. The proposed concept is utilized to design a full K1-band OMT that is essential for space and mobile applications. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed OMT design is verified through a back-to-back measurement showing an excellent agreement between the full-wave simulations and measurements. Nevertheless, the proposed design achieves a measured matching level of 19 dB for the two modes and isolation level between them beyond 30 dB over the entire band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207