Evaluation of the anti-cancer activity of a curcumin analogue alone and in combination with current chemotherapeutics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Melanoma is an aggressive malignancy that arises from melanocytes in the deeper skin layers. It is responsible for the majority of skin cancer deaths globally. Current treatment options include surgical excision, chemotherapies including cisplatin and taxol, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. Despite these treatments, the survival rate for malignant melanoma remains relatively low. Curcumin is naturally available as Curcuma longa (turmeric) and has thus far shown to have pharmacologic activity against melanoma cell lines in early studies. However, due to poor bioavailability and stability, naturally occurring curcumin is not an effective treatment for melanoma. These issues are avoided by synthesizing derivatives of curcumin (analogues). In this study we aim to assess the ability of one such analogue, compound A, to kill melanoma cells and to investigate if compound A works synergistically with the known chemotherapies taxol and cisplatin. I plan to use morphological and biochemical assays to determine cell viability, apoptosis (cell suicide), and autophagy in cancer cells following treatment. Preliminary results have shown that compound A is effective in inducing apoptosis in melanoma cells, and further work will determine its interactions with common chemotherapeutics. The result of this work could lead to a more effective and safer treatment using compound A alone or in combination with taxol and cisplatin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".