MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2800104529 · doi:10.3838/jjo.67.25

Transition in Nesting Methods and Behaviors from Non-Avian Dinosaurs to Birds

2018· article· en· W2800104529 on OpenAlexaff
Kohei Tanaka, Darla K. Zelenitsky, François Therrien, Yoshitsugu Kobayashi

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Ornithology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsRoyal Tyrrell MuseumUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNesting (process)ZoologyTransition (genetics)GeographyBiologyEcologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

主竜類(ワニ類,翼竜類,そして鳥類を含む恐竜類など)は,非常に多様で成功した陸上脊椎動物である.絶滅種(例,非鳥類型恐竜類)及び現生種(ワニ類及び鳥類)の営巣方法や営巣行動を理解することは,主竜類の進化や多様性を検討する上で重要である.しかしながら,恐竜類の営巣方法や営巣行動は,多くの場合,化石記録から直接観察できないため,かれらの営巣様式(巣の構造,抱卵行動,孵化日数など)は,卵・巣・胚化石から得られる特徴(クラッチサイズ,卵重,卵殻間隙率,胚の形態的特徴など)を用いて推定・復元される.非鳥類型恐竜類の巣や営巣行動は多様だったと考えられ,恐竜類を含め主竜類におけるこれらの形質の進化が議論できる.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Ornithology→Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→