L'indice de progrès véritable du Québec : Quand l'économie dépasse l'écologie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'indice de progres veritable du Quebec. Quand l'economie depasse l'ecologie comprend une vingtaine de chapitres sur autant d'aspects du developpement du Quebec depuis la Revolution tranquille. Pour chacun, il presente une analyse des «externalites» sociales et environnementales qui minent notre avenir, mais dont le PIB ne tient pas compte, pas plus que les milieux financiers, economiques et politiques. Pour chaque composante de l'indice, il presente un portrait des couts en cause et un calcul de la valeur monetaire de ces couts. Le resultat montre que notre «progres» est environ la moitie de ce qui est maladroitement signale par le PIB actuel et que meme ce progres est a risque face au depassement de l'empreinte ecologique de la societe, des societes, et aux tendances des principaux parametres de notre developpement. Parmi ceux-ci, le livre met en evidence l'importance des couts des emissions de gaz a effet de serre du Quebec tout comme ceux du chomage dont le niveau depasse l'acceptable depuis des decennies et va de pair avec la croissance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".