MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800184479 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2018.8351332

Design of a Low Latency 40 Gb/s Flow-Based Traffic Manager Using High-Level Synthesis

2018· article· en· W2800184479 on OpenAlexafffund
Imad Benacer, François-Raymond Boyer, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork packetQuality of serviceComputer networkLatency (audio)Traffic shapingField-programmable gate arrayScheduling (production processes)Packet processingQueueing theoryEmbedded systemNetwork traffic controlOperating systemEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a traffic manager architecture targeting to meet today's networking requirements, especially reduced latency, and to support the upcoming 5G technology in the software defined networking context. The proposed traffic manager functionalities are policing, scheduling, shaping, and queuing of incoming traffic (packets). The incoming traffic is assumed to be a set of flows in a network processing unit. Traffic management imposes constraints on packets to be sent out in such a way to meet the allowed bandwidth quotas for each flow, and enforce desired quality of service (QoS) targets. The FPGA prototyped architecture is based on the C++ language and is synthesized with the Vivado High-Level Synthesis (HLS) tool. The proposed traffic manager design supports 40 Gb/s per egress port for 64-byte sized packets, running at 80 MHz when implemented on a ZC706 Xilinx board. A throughput improvement of 4.0× over previous reported works is claimed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207