« Repose en paix » : pour le respect des droits des Anicinabek dans leurs rituels funéraires1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se penche sur les rites funéraires des Anicinabek (Algonquins) du Québec, en retraçant leur histoire jusqu’aux pratiques contemporaines. Il met l’accent sur les changements ayant contraint les Anicinabek à composer avec des règlements exogènes. De nos jours, si de nombreuses traditions persistent, la nécessité de se conformer à certaines normes fait parfois violence à leurs us et croyances. Nous relevons donc les questions qu’ils se posent face aux problèmes qu’ils rencontrent, ainsi que les adaptations qu’ils ont élaborées. Pour terminer, nous recommandons que les Amérindiens aient davantage accès aux informations concernant leurs droits ancestraux et que les intervenants des domaines entourant la mort soient sensibilisés pour un meilleur respect des personnes amérindiennes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".