MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800219737 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2003-0008

VIBRATION ANALYSIS OF CANTILEVER TYPE CRACKED ROTOR IN VISCOUS FLUID

2003· article· en· W2800219737 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCantileverRotor (electric)VibrationMechanicsStructural engineeringViscous liquidMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing utilisation of rotors in industries and other fields require interpretation of their vibration characteristics and failure conditions. Therefore, computer programmes that have been used will have to be constantly updated. This paper deals with the cantilever type rotor containing a transverse crack subjected to viscous medium. Damping effect and virtual mass effect are taken into account through Navier Stokes equation. The stiff-ness of the cracked shaft is evaluated from the theory of fracture mechanics. For analysis rotor with different crack depth, subjected different viscous medium is considered. The numerical result obtained from theoretical analysis is compared with the experimental results, which agree well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it