Pathophysiological Mapping of Experimental Heart Failure: Left and Right Ventricular Remodeling in Transverse Aortic Constriction Is Temporally, Kinetically and Structurally Distinct
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A growing proportion of heart failure patients present with impairments in both ventricles. Experimental pressure-overload (i.e., transverse aortic constriction, TAC) induces left ventricle (LV) hypertrophy and failure, as well as right ventricle (RV) dysfunction. However, little is known about the coordinated progression of biventricular dysfunction that occurs in TAC. Here we investigated the time course of systolic and diastolic function in both the LV and RV concurrently to improve our understanding of the chronology of events in TAC. Hemodynamic, histological, and morphometric assessments were obtained from the LV and RV at 2, 4, 9 and 18wks post-surgery. Results: Systolic pressures peaked in both ventricles at 4wks, thereafter steadily declining in the LV, while remaining elevated in the RV. The LV and RV followed different structural and functional timelines, proving the patterns in one ventricle are independent from the opposing ventricle. RV hypertrophy/fibrosis and pulmonary arterial remodeling confirmed a progressive right-sided pathology. Temporality further identified both compensation and decompensation in the LV with persistent concentric hypertrophy in both phases. And finally, diastolic impairments in both ventricles manifested as an intricate progression of multiple parameters that were not in agreement until overt systolic failure was evident. Conclusions: We establish pulmonary hypertension was secondary to LV dysfunction, confirming TAC is a model of type II pulmonary hypertension. This study also challenges some common assumptions in experimental HF (e.g., the relationship between fibrosis and filling pressure) while addressing a knowledge gap with respect to temporality of RV remodeling in pressure-overload.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".