Reclamation of Unconventional Oil Processed Water through the Adsorption of Naphthenic Acids by Carbon Xerogel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the use of carbon xerogel (CX) material for the adsorption of naphthenic acids (NAs). The adsorption of NAs is crucial for the reclamation of unconventional oil processed water, more specifically Alberta’s oil sands process-affected water (OSPW). CX material is synthesized at specific operating pH conditions to result in a material that exhibits an extensive mesoporous character. Therefore, the employment of CX as an adsorbent can not only promote the adsorption of a wider range of complex NAs present in OSPW, but can also be synthesized to provide textural characteristics that adhere to contaminants present in all forms of unconventional oil processed water. This thesis begins with a review of the fundamentals of the adsorption phenomena, then provides a comprehensive analysis of Alberta’s OSPW with an elaborate description of the characteristics of NAs present in OSPW. Furthermore, the various treatment technologies that have been studied to treat OSPW from NAs is discussed with special focus on adsorption processes. The evaluation of the adsorbents discussed in this section reveals that their performance is restricted given that they are derived from raw materials, which accordingly limits their textural properties. As a result, the utilization of synthesized CX is necessary to enhance the removal of NAs form OSPW through adsorption. As a preliminary investigation of CX to treat OSPW, identifying the adsorption mechanisms responsible for the removal of NAs is initially required to further enhance the performance of CX in actual OSPW. Therefore, this study focusses on examining the efficacy of CX in terms of adsorbing model NA compounds; more specifically, heptanoic acid (HPA), 5-cyclohexanepentanoic acid (CHPA), and 5-Phenylvaleric acid (PVA). All three model NAs contain a carboxylic acid and long chain structure, with exception to CHPA which contains an additional cyclic ring, and PVA contains an aromatic ring. Therefore, by exploring the adsorption of these three model compounds, at pH 8, onto CX, the structure-activity relations responsible for adsorption are deduced. Furthermore, HPA, the simplest compound among the three, is examined in focus at three pH conditions, pH 8, 6.5, and 5, which are above, near, and below the pH of point zero charge for CX, 6.8. Therefore, the electrostatic interactions responsible for the adsorption of NAs onto CX can be identified. Note that at all conditions, similar investigations were conducted with granular activated carbon (GAC) to evaluate the effectiveness of CX relative to the conventional adsorbent used for the removal of NAs form OSPW. Moreover, the results were analyzed per adsorbent capacity, the internal diffusion model, and adsorption rate models; pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order, to demonstrate that CX performs exceptionally well relative to GAC due to its mesoporous structure. More specifically, the results have revealed that PVA, the more complex NA is adsorbed more easily by CX due to π-π interactions, followed by HPA due to its surfactant-like structure, and finally CHPA is adsorbed least due to its high molecular weight which delays its kinetics. The role of hydrophobic-hydrophobic forces has been noted during the diffusion of the three model NAs into the stagnant film surrounding the CX surface, and the hydrophobic bonding may be recognized as negatively charged assisted hydrogen bonding (-CAHB). In terms of HPA, van der Waals attractive forces, in the form of dipole-dipole attractions, have been recognized as the probable electrostatic mechanism responsible for the stronger attraction of HPA onto CX.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".