MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800258733 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2006-0019

FINITE ELEMENT CALCULATIONS FOR INCOMPRESSIBLE MATERIALS USING A MODIFIED LU DECOMPOSITION

2006· article· en· W2800258733 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Lisa M. Coley, Allan T. Dolovich

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuadrilateralFinite element methodCompressibilityPlane stressAxial symmetryDisplacement (psychology)MathematicsBoundary value problemStress (linguistics)Mathematical analysisCylinderStructural engineeringGeometryMechanicsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An approach for stabilising the finite element analysis of incompressible materials is presented. Although many effective methods exist for addressing incompressibility when applied forces or stress tractions are known, this paper explores cases where displacements are the only prescribed quantities on the boundary. In particular, the standard u-p formulation with isoparametric, quadrilateral, constant pressure, plane strain elements is considered. It is well known that these elements suffer from extreme numerical instability under displacement boundary conditions. A modified LU decomposition is used to filter the equations to produce a reduced nonsingular system leading to determination of the von Mises stress. The method is demonstrated with two test cases commonly used to assess element performance: a rectangular block in a uniform state ofplane strain; and an axially restrained thick-walled cylinder subjected to internal and external pressures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207