MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800261391

L'idéal chrétien dans le discours de Saint-Vallier : Estat present de l'Eglise et de la colonie dans la Nouvelle France (1685-1686)

2000· article· fr· W2800261391 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julie Trouboul

Bibliographic record

VenueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval) · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mgr de Saint-Vallier, grand vicaire et futur évêque de Québec, aborde pour la première fois son futur diocèse en juillet 1685, il le parcourt pendant près 16 mois. Il publie le récit de sa visite pastorale en 1688, ce compte rendu a pour objectif premier de susciter des dons en faveur de la Nouvelle-France, cependant, l'analyse de son discours nous révèle bien davantage. Ce compte rendu illustre la perception du Nouveau Monde de Saint-Vallier. Il témoigne de la représentation qu'il se fait de son futur diocèse comme d'un lieu propice à l'établissement du Royaume divin, où la présence de Dieu est particulièrement prégnante. Les vertus des habitants de la colonie apparaissent, elles aussi, idéales ; leur attitude répond exactement à la norme promue par la Réforme catholique. Ainsi, cette présentation souligne la référence tridentine du prélat. Le récit de Saint-Vallier suggère, en outre, son ambition de parfaire et de généraliser ces dispositions vertueuses au moyen d'un encadrement étroit du fidèle au sein d'une Église canadienne établie, et ce, dans le dessein d'établir le règne de Dieu en Nouvelle-France.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval)Same topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207