Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis provides an analysis of Métis territoriality by examining the importance of Métis connection to land and place. In utilizing written archival document, as well as unwritten such as maps and photographs, the research sheds light on the connection Métis people had with the displaced community of Wolf Lake, Alberta. In examining the displaced Métis community of Wolf Lake, which became a Métis settlement in the 1930s and was disbanded in 1960, the research reveals the layered connection to specific places. Wolf Lake was once a Métis wintering place, where families gathered to hunt and trap during the winter months. As settlement encroached upon Métis mobility, Wolf Lake became a more permanent year round community. It was a place where Métis families made a living with the land, which fostered their political, economic and social traditions. Such connections to land and place occurred through daily life activities, one based on reciprocity with all living and non-living relations. The colonial system disregarded the sophisticated way of knowing of Métis peoples and communities. Dispossession occurred at Wolf Lake due to colonial understanding of land as a ‘thing’. Therefore governments and settlers harnessed the area for its resources such as oil, gas, and timber, and for its military potential with the establishment of the Primrose Air Weapons Range in 1956. Government initiatives and systems functioned to disinherit Métis peoples from the land. The research renders these histories of forced displacement visible, in order to challenge narratives that erase Indigenous histories, and enables a platform by which Indigenous histories and relations to the land may be reframed. Wolf Lake serves as an important reminder of the existence of Métis territory, and the importance of Métis places
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".