MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800274434 · doi:10.1109/jmems.2018.2830770

Analytical Modeling and Experimental Verification of Nonlinear Mode Coupling in a Decoupled Tuning Fork Microresonator

2018· article· en· W2800274434 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microelectromechanical Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsTuning forkNonlinear systemVibrationPhysicsResonance (particle physics)Normal modeNatural frequencyCoupling (piping)Perturbation (astronomy)Equations of motionMode couplingKinematicsResonatorMechanicsNonlinear resonanceExcitationClassical mechanicsAcousticsOpticsMaterials scienceAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides the analytical and experimental studies into the nonlinear mode coupling in a tuning fork microresonator, with electrostatic actuation at forced and internal resonance frequencies. The analytical investigation leads to modal equations that take into account kinematic and electrostatic nonlinearities. The equations of motion are derived using Lagrange's energy method. The theoretical resonance curves are determined by using the two-variable expansion perturbation technique near simultaneous subharmonic and internal resonances. The two desired mode shapes of the device are tailored to establish an approximate two-to-one frequency ratio between their natural frequencies. A sample device design is fabricated in a commercial foundry process. The influence of AC driving levels and a detuning parameter, due to inevitable fabrication imperfections, on the system dynamics are investigated theoretically and experimentally. It is shown that the deviation from ideal internal resonance condition separates the region of the nonlinear vibration into two distinct excitation frequencies. The model and simulated results obtained by the perturbation analysis are validated by comparing them with the experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it