MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800281250 · doi:10.1002/humu.23431

<i>MERTK</i> mutation update in inherited retinal diseases

2018· review· en· W2800281250 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Isabelle Audo, Saddek Mohand‐Saïd, Élise Boulanger-Scemama, Xavier Zanlonghi, Christel Condroyer, Vanessa Démontant, Fiona Boyard, Aline Antonio, Cécile Méjécase, Saïd El Shamieh, José‐Alain Sahel, Christina Zeitz

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Mutation · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la RechercheFondation Voir et EntendreAgence Nationale de la RechercheFoundation Fighting Blindness
KeywordsMERTKBiologyMissense mutationGeneticsDystrophyRetinal pigment epitheliumRetinitis pigmentosaRetinalPhenotypeGeneReceptor tyrosine kinaseKinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MER tyrosine kinase (MERTK) encodes a surface receptor localized at the apical membrane of the retinal pigment epithelium. It plays a critical role in photoreceptor outer segment internalization prior to phagocytosis. Mutations in MERTK have been associated with severe autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies in the RCS rat and in humans. We present here a comprehensive review of all reported MERTK disease causing variants with the associated phenotype. In addition, we provide further data and insights of a large cohort of 1,195 inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) index cases applying state-of-the-art genotyping techniques and summarize current knowledge. A total of 79 variants have now been identified underlying rod-cone dystrophy and cone-rod dystrophy including 11 novel variants reported here. The mutation spectrum in MERTK includes 33 missense, 12 nonsense, 12 splice defects, 12 small deletions, two small insertion-deletions, three small duplications, and two exonic and three gross deletions. Altogether, mutations in MERTK account for ∼2% of IRD cases with a severe retinal phenotype. These data are important for current and future therapeutic trials including gene replacement therapy or cell-based therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman MutationSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207