MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2800287124 · doi:10.1017/cem.2018.273

P075: Discovering the unknown: using storytelling to identify emergent learning needs for the intrinsic competencies within an online needs assessment

2018· article· en· W2800287124 on OpenAlexaff
D. Jo, Eric Tseng, Kerstin de Wit, Teresa M. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media in Health Education
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStorytellingThematic analysisNeeds assessmentMedicineContext (archaeology)Medical educationNarrativePsychologyKnowledge managementComputer scienceQualitative research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Free Open Access Medical education (FOAM) resources have been developed using various needs assessment methods. We describe a storytelling exercise used to identify unperceived medical expert learning needs, which also resulted in the emergence of unknown learning needs within intrinsic physician roles. Methods: A FOAM curriculum was created for thrombosis based on an online needs assessment comprised of a topic listing, case scenarios, and a storytelling exercise. In the storytelling exercise, learners described i) a difficult case in thrombosis, and ii) why that case was difficult. In this qualitative description study, we performed a secondary thematic analysis of this storytelling data, coded for CanMEDS 2015 intrinsic roles. Two investigators independently coded transcripts to iteratively generate a coding framework. Results: 143 respondents completed the storytelling exercise. All responses yielded a gap in medical expertise, while 25 (17.5%) described an additional intrinsic theme. Learning needs in all six intrinsic roles were identified. The most commonly cited learning needs were in the Leader (recognizing how resource allocation impacts healthcare), Communicator (communicating expert knowledge with patients), and Collaborator (unclear communication between providers) domains. Participants who described an intrinsic learning need were primarily from emergency medicine (21/25, 84.0%). These excerpts were notable for how they expressed the complexity and affective components of medicine. Conclusion: Storytelling exercises can highlight context, attitudes, and relationships which provide depth to needs assessments. These narratives are a novel method of capturing emergent learning needs, which may be unknown to learner and faculty (Johari window). These intrinsic learning needs may ultimately be used to enrich learner-centered curricula.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.348
GPT teacher head0.486
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine→Same topicSocial Media in Health Education→French-language works237,207→