Grado (Asturias). Arqueología urbana de una villa medieval en el Camino de Santiago
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolA mediados del siglo XIII la concesion de la carta de poblacion impulsa a Grado a transformarse en una villa activa y destacada del sector central de Asturias. Su ventajosa situacion en una importante zona de transito, dinamizo el desarrollo y diversificacion social y economica de la poblacion local. El espacio urbano medieval se caracteriza por la existencia de un pequeno nucleo amurallado y el desarrollo del caserio principal en la zona extramuros. En el siglo XIX la villa renuncia a mantener en pie dos de las construcciones mas destacadas de su pasado, la iglesia y la muralla. En la decada de 1990 se puso en marcha un plan de recuperacion historicoarqueologica del casco historico de la villa que, en fechas recientes, ha permitido recuperar parte del espacio amurallado y la dignificacion de su entorno. EnglishIt was in the middle of the thirteenth century that the granting of the town charter pushed Grado to become an active and important town in the central part of Asturias. Its advantageous situation as a major transit area energized the social and economic development and diversification of the local population. The medieval city is characterized by the existence of a small walled centre and the development of the main village in the area outside the walls. In the nineteenth century the town neglected to prop up two of the most prominent buildings of the past, the church and the wall. The ambitious archaeological restoration project of the Old Quarter launched in the 1990s has recently allowed to recover part of the walled space and the dignity of the environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".