Combined Adsorption and Biodegradation Processes for Oil Sands Process-Affected Water Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oil sands process-affected water (OSPW) generated from bitumen extraction of oil sands by industries in Northern Alberta, Canada, is a great environmental concern because of the OSPW toxicity in the environment. This toxicity has been attributed to a group of alicyclic and aliphatic compounds containing carboxyl radicals known as naphthenic acids (NAs). Thus, appropriate OSPW treatment approaches are urgently needed to permit the safe discharge of treated OSPW to the receiving environment. By realizing the above need, the current study treats oil sands process-affected water (OSPW) using engineered granular activated carbon (GAC) biofilm reactors by applying different modes of operation (continuous, semicontinuous and batch) for both raw and ozonated OSPW treatments. After 120 days of continuous operation of a GAC fluidized bed biofilm reactor (FBBR), it was shown that the GAC-FBBR process (adsorption and biodegradation) removed more than 86% of classical NAs from raw OSPW. Generally, ozonation is known to be effective in the removal of NAs from raw OSPW. Using a combined 80 mg/L utilized ozone dose followed by GAC-FBBR treatment of ozonated OSPW resulted in the removal of > 99% of classical NAs. In addition, the overall removal of the acid extractable organic-fraction (AEF) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were 88% and 62%, respectively from this combined process. Further analysis of the microbial community using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) - denatured gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) from both raw and ozonated OSPW and their respective GAC-FBBR biofilms showed that there was reduced diversity of the microbial structure in the GAC biofilm with the majority of the bacteria being carbon degraders. Further study investigated the synergistic removal of NAs (classical and oxidized) and toxicity from a simultaneous GAC adsorption and biodegradation treatment of raw and ozonated OSPW (20 mg/L utilized ozone dose). At a GAC dose of 0.4 g GAC/L OSPW, this process removed 93% and 96% of classical NAs, and 74% and 77% of oxidized NAs from raw and ozonated OSPW, respectively. As well, this process reduced the toxicity of both raw and ozonated OSPW. There was higher removal of COD, AEF and NAs from the simultaneous GAC adsorption and biodegradation treatment of OSPW compared to the biodegradation or adsorption only treatments which indicated the enhanced bioregeneration in the GAC biofilm process. The lower utilized ozone dose used in these experiments (as compared with 80 mg/L previously) had little impact on the removal of both classical and oxidized NAs in the raw OSPW as compared to the 80 mg/L utilized ozone dose used in previous experiments. The analysis of the microbial community using PCR-DGGE cannot reveal the comprehensive and complete characterization of microbial community in OSPW. Therefore, a high throughput 454-pyrosequencing was performed for analyzing the microbial community in the GAC biofilm, where biofilm was allowed to form in another set of experiments using a semicontinuous process (batch process with continuous change of OSPW). Frequent observations of the biofilm growth (every six days) on the GAC surface was performed using a confocal laser scanning microscope, real time PCR, and heterotrophic plate count with results showing an effective growth of biofilm. The dominant microbial composition in the GAC biofilm was Proteobacteria and further analysis of Proteobacteria revealed that the GAC biofilm was rich with carbon degrading orders of bacteria namely Myxococcales, Pseudomonadales, and Burkholderiales. The GAC biofilm microbial community was able to remove over 66% of NAs in the ozonated OSPW treatment after a short contact time. Overall the study demonstrated an effective removal of NAs (classical and oxidized) and toxicity from OSPW, which indicated that the GAC biofilm treatment approach is a promising technology for OSPW remediation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".