MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800377415 · doi:10.23937/2378-346x/1410085

The Visual Effects Associated with Head-Mounted Displays

2018· article· en· W2800377415 on OpenAlexaff
Yuan Jing, Behzad Mansouri, Pettey Jeff H, Ahmed Sarah Farukhi, Khaderi S Khizer

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Ophthalmology and Clinical Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersSchool of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaViterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern CaliforniaResearch to Prevent Blindness
KeywordsTask (project management)Computer scienceDigital libraryMEDLINEInformation retrievalPopulationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive search query was performed on the Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore databases. We identified population-based studies that evaluated HMDs as an independent factor for visual discomfort. Potential variables relevant to HMD discomfort, including system features (e.g. optical characteristics), subject characteristics (e.g. gender), and task characteristics (e.g. duration, vection, and task content) were reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0100.013
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.565
Teacher spread0.482 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Ophthalmology and Clinical ResearchSame topicErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersFrench-language works237,207