MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800382220 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.13.2.2e

Comment Peut-On Être Persan? Ou Les Enjeux D’Une Analyse Flmique

2004· article· en· W2800382220 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Monique Jucquois‐Delpierre

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory, Culture, and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarratologySociologyCharacter (mathematics)HumanitiesNarrativePhilosophyArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article studies the character of the “Stranger” in film in the light of theories and methodologies developed in intercultural communication studies by ethologist Edward T. Hall, in film narratology by Peter Wuss, and in literary studies by Vincent Jouve. The personality of the stranger is analyzed through a theoretical model derived from Wuss’s three filmic structures - the conceptual, the perceptual and the stereotypical - and Jouve’s approach to the analysis of novelistic characters. Through the lens of Wuss’s three structures, this article seeks to answer questions similar to the one posed by Montesquieu in his 18th-century Lettres Persanes : “How can one be Persian?”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicHistory, Culture, and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207