MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800396816 · doi:10.21273/hortsci12822-17

‘Sunglow’ American Witchhazel

2018· article· en· W2800396816 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lisa W. Alexander, Anthony L. Witcher, Michael Arnold

Bibliographic record

VenueHortScience · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genus Hamamelis L. (Hamamelidaceae R. Br., the witchhazel family) is represented by about six species distributed across the temperate regions of North America and Asia Although as many as 15 species are reported and Hamamelis mexicana Standl., morphological and phylogenetic analysis support a monophyletic clade of Hamamelis with six species Hamamelis species are large shrubs or small trees bearing characteristically narrow, strap-like flower petals and capsulate fruit that co-occur with flower buds and flowers. North American species include Hamamelis vernalis Sarg. (vernal or Ozark witchhazel) which is found in the Ozark Mountains of Oklahoma, Missouri, and Arkansas and in Texas; Hamamelis virginiana L., widely distributed in rich but dry woodlands from southern Canada into the eastern and central United States; and Hamamelis ovalis S.W. Leonard (bigleaf witchhazel), a new species represented by a few populations in Mississippi and Alabama Hamamelis vernalis is smaller than H. virginiana and is grown as an ornamental plant in U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) hardiness Zones 3-8 (USDA, 2012). It flowers from December to March and has fragrant, orange-red flowers. Hamamelis virginiana is a medium to large shrub producing lemon-yellow flowers from October to December. Hamamelis ovalis is a large-leafed, creeping shrub producing orange-red flowers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHortScienceSame topicEuropean history and politicsFrench-language works237,207