Postoperative Numbness: A Survey of Patients After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Hip arthroscopic surgery is a rapidly growing procedure that requires distraction of the leg to access the joint. A frequently reported complication of this procedure is postoperative numbness, with rates between 1% and 20% reported in the literature. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the factors contributing to the development and effect of numbness on functional outcomes. We hypothesized that this complication is underreported and that its prevalence is higher than what has been described in the literature. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who had undergone hip arthroscopic surgery between 2012 and 2016 were included, and a telephone survey was conducted to collect data. Data related to the procedure and outcome scores were collected via a systematic chart review for the included patients. Data analysis was conducted for means, SDs, frequencies, and percentages. For comparative statistics, t tests and multiple logistic regression models were used. Results: A total of 221 patients (113 male, 108 female; mean age, 39.8 ± 13.34 years) completed the survey out of 362 eligible patients. Overall, 37% (n = 82) of patients reported having experienced some form of numbness after surgery. Approximately 43% (35/82) of the patients reported resolution by 6 weeks postoperatively, and 68% (56/82) of numbness was reported to have completely resolved by 6 months. The duration of surgery was a significant factor for the development of postoperative numbness ( P = .010; odds ratio, 2.18) when comparing procedures longer than 50 minutes with procedures shorter than 50 minutes (first incision until closure). Postoperative numbness was associated with a negative effect on the International Hip Outcome Tool–33 (iHOT-33) score that reached statistical significance at the 1-year (numbness, 60.19; no numbness, 74.21; P = .006) and 2-year time points (numbness, 52.04; no numbness, 72.69; P = .01). Conclusion: This study confirmed our hypothesis that postoperative numbness is more common in our patient population than the incidence reported in the literature. This adverse event was also shown to be associated with decreased postoperative functional outcomes, as measured by the iHOT-33 at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".