MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

As redes da Educação Integral no Distrito Federal sob o prisma da Gestão Escolar

2018· article· pt· W2800423192 on OpenAlex
Ivonete Ferreira de Sousa, Ranilce Guimarães-Iosif, Sinara Pollom Zardo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnsaio Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo Este artigo analisa as redes da educação integral segundo a interpretação da gestão escolar. Trata-se de um estudo qualitativo realizado em uma escola pública do Distrito Federal, baseado no método do ciclo de políticas. Utilizaram-se as técnicas de análise documental e realizaram-se observações e entrevistas semiestruturadas com gestores do Projeto Educação Integral em Tempo Integral (PROEITI). Os resultados apontaram que o PROEITI avançou ao ampliar a oferta para todas as crianças matriculadas em uma jornada de 10 horas diárias, e possibilitou a contratação de professores concursados para atuar nas disciplinas complementares e nas disciplinas de informática e educação física. Os maiores desafios vivenciados pelos gestores relacionam-se à limitação de verbas para o desenvolvimento das atividades propostas pela educação integral, à carência de formação continuada dos docentes e à restrição de estrutura física das escolas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.047

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it