MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800444002 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2016-0070

ESTABLISHMENT OF DYNAMIC EQUATIONS FOR DAMPED SYSTEMS BASED ON QUASI-VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLES

2016· article· en· W2800444002 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuhua Pan, Yuanfeng Wang, Li Su

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBeijing Jiaotong UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsVariational principleHamilton's principleViscoelasticityVariational integratorMechanical systemViscous dampingMathematicsBasis (linear algebra)Classical mechanicsExponential functionVariational methodMathematical analysisPhysicsApplied mathematicsEquations of motionComputer scienceVibrationGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, quasi-variational principles for non-conservative damped systems are studied. A Hamiltontype quasi-variational principle for non-conservative systems in analytical mechanics and a quasi-variational principle of potential energy in non-conservative elastodynamics systems are proposed in simplified forms respectively, by using the direct variational integral method. On the basis of the standard linear solid model for viscoelastic materials, the dynamic equations of exponentially damped systems are established through the proposed quasi-variational principles. A distinction between the internal damping described by exponential damping and the external damping described by viscous one in a vibrating structure is according to different physical mechanisms, which gives some indication of the correct mechanism of damping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207