Médecine publique médecine privée : Un choix de société
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La gestion du systeme de sante est un enjeu majeur de notre societe car elle concerne chacun des individus qui en fait partie. Au Quebec l'immobilisme gouvernemental combine aux attentes chaque fois plus importantes de la population relativement a une medecine de plus en plus complexe et onereuse ont nourri un mecontentement bien legitime. On parle souvent de « crise du systeme de sante » en proposant sans cesse l'alternative privee. Or les « crises » surviennent generalement par negligence ou parce qu'elles sont provoquees et entretenues. Et si c'etait un des buts inavoues ? Qui beneficie reellement de la privatisation de certains secteurs du systeme de sante ? Est-ce que la privatisation ou la semi-privatisation constitue reellement une solution aux problemes indiscutables du reseau public ? Le debat est complexe tout comme ses solutions mais necessaire car il implique un choix social politique et economique. Dans notre monde globalise les enjeux depassent souvent les frontieres nationales et les pressions qui viennent du monde corporatif multinational peuvent paraitre insurmontables?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".