MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2800460704 · doi:10.3138/jammi.3.1.01

Guidance on use of antiviral drugs given potential low vaccine effectiveness for the 2017–2018 influenza season

2018· article· en· W2800460704 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Upton Allen, Fred Y. Aoki, Gerald A. Evans, Michél Laverdière, Danuta M. Skowronski, H Grant Stiver

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontQueen's UniversityKingston General HospitalUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Centre for Disease ControlHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfluenza seasonMedicineInfluenza vaccineAntiviral treatmentAntiviral drugVirologyFlu seasonDrugEnvironmental healthVaccinationIntensive care medicineVirusPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Influenza vaccine is recommended annually to reduce the influenza-associated disease burden, particularly among those at high risk of serious influenza complications ( 1 ). However, a potential for low vaccine effectiveness (VE) has been identified for the 2017–2018 influenza season. To address that concern, the following antiviral drug recommendations have been revised (see Table 1 , changes in bold) from the AMMI Canada Foundation Document ( 2 ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0110.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada→Same topicInfluenza Virus Research Studies→French-language works237,207→