MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800467337

Ivone Gebara, Le mal au féminin. Réflexions théologiques à partir du féminisme | Joan Chittister, Le feu sous les cendres. Une spiritualité pour la vie religieuse contemporaine. Paris, L’Harmattan, 1999, 247 | Montréal, Bellarmin, 1998

2002· article· fr· W2800467337 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristoff Talin

Bibliographic record

VenueClio. Femmes, Genre, Histoire · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malgre des differences thematiques importantes, les deux livres dont il est question ici presentent suffisamment de similitudes pour justifier une presentation synoptique, leurs auteures ayant de nombreux points communs. Ce sont tout d’abord des religieuses feministes, inscrites dans la modernite. Depuis un lustre, l’Eglise catholique romaine est intervenue avec fermete pour limiter les propos de ces deux religieuses theologiennes, Ivone Gebara et Joan Chittister. Ainsi en aout 1995, la Congr...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClio. Femmes, Genre, HistoireSame topicReligion, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207