Camera-Witness: Women's Documentary Responses to the Polytechnique Massacre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article fait un retour sur cinq documentaires réalisés en réponse au massacre de la Polytechnique et réalisés par des femmes: After the Montreal Massacre de Gerry Roger (1990), Riposte de Suzanne Vertue (1990), Au-delà du 6 décembre de Catherine Fol (1991), Marker of Change de Moira Simpson (1998), et Legacy of Pain de Francine Pelletier (1999). S'il est vrai que les traumatismes historiques provoquent des crises de la vérité et du sens, les témoignages médiatisés par ces films ont contribué de façon centrale aux débats publics à propos de la signification culturelle du massacre de Polytechnique. J'analyse ces comptes rendus situés, qui s'opposent souvent l'un à l'autre et qui sont chargés d'affects, faits par des documentaristes provenant des contextes aussi différents que sont le Québec et le Canada anglais. J'explore la façon dont la rhétorique de ces documentaires fonctionne en forgeant des liens entre les vivants et les morts, évoquant des collectivités ancrées dans des milieux linguistiques, politiques et géographiques différents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".